
A transport truck is buried under a mountain of corn headed for the ethanol production plant.
With food prices soaring, should the U.S. keep subsidizing farmers?
Washington's love affair with corn-based ethanol may be cooling, but President Bush and Congress are heatedly clashing over who is to blame for delays in responding to skyrocketing gas and food prices. Bush on Tuesday defended ethanol production, saying "it's in our national interest that our farmers grow energy, as opposed to us purchasing energy from parts of the world that are unstable or may not like us."
More and more legislators are blaming the rising use of corn as a biofuel as a key factor behind high food prices. Others want to freeze the federal mandate on biofuels production at current levels, reversing legislation passed just a few months ago that increases it through 2022. Still others are pushing to shift tax incentives away from corn-based to cellulose-based ethanol in the nearly completed farm bill. Bush favors shifting to cellulosic ethanol, too.
But should government subsidize the production of ethanol? Should government subsidize agriculture at all? Should fuel trump food, or does cheaper fuel also help keep food prices low?















Thoughts
Dow struggles higher
Submitted on November 26th, 2008 by AnonymousHi
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The Nasdaq slipped Tuesday, but the Dow and S&P 500 ended higher for the third straight session as investors welcomed the government's latest efforts to jumpstart lending, but remained cautious.
Treasury prices surged, lowering the corresponding yields. The dollar tumbled versus major currencie and oil prices slumped.
The Dow Jones industrial average (INDU) gained 0.4%, ending higher for the third session in a row. The last time the Dow gained for three straight sessions was in late August.
The Standard & Poor's 500 (SPX) index added 0.7%. The Nasdaq composite (COMP) lost 0.5%.
Stocks rose in the morning after the government announced a pair of new programs that will provide roughly $800 billion to increase the availability of consumer and mortgage lending. (Full story)
But the advance petered out and stocks plunged through the afternoon as investors sorted through weak economic readings and opted to cash out of some of the recent technology winners. The market ended in mixed territory.
"It's positive that the federal government is being proactive and the bond market certainly loves it today, because it's explicit demand for bonds," said Brian Battle, vice president at Performance Trust Capital Partners. "But the stock market is less certain."
He said stock investors may also be taking the scope of Tuesday's $800 billion announcement as a sign that things are actually as bad as some fear. The GDP and housing market reports added to those concerns.
There may also be frustration that despite the massive amounts of money being put to work by the government, the tangible improvement has been minimal, said Robert Loest, portfolio manager at Integrity Funds.
"All of this money is being used in an ad-hoc fashion that doesn't seem to be helping the job market or stabilizing the financial system," Loest said.
"I think we are creating a huge debt load and we're not really getting anywhere," he said.
On the plus side, he thinks the market is setting itself up for a short-term technical rally, due to both the psychology having gotten so bad recently and the enormous amount of cash on the sidelines.
Wednesday brings a buffet of economic reports, including readings on jobless claims, income and spending, manufacturing, housing and consumer sentiment.
Stocks surged Monday in a broad rally as Citigroup (C, Fortune 500)'s massive rescue package and President-elect Barack Obama's picks for his economic team pushed investors off the sidelines.
Including Friday's advance, the Dow gained 891.10 points for the period, its biggest two-session gain ever, according to Dow Jones. The two-day percentage gain of 11.8% was the biggest since October 1987. The S&P 500's rise of 13.2% was also its biggest two-session percentage gain since October 1987.
All financial markets are closed Thursday for Thanksgiving. Markets have a shortened session on Friday.
Economy: The U.S. economy saw its worst quarterly decline in seven years, the Commerce Department reported Tuesday. GDP declined at an annual rate of 0.5% in the third quarter versus an earlier reading of a decline of 0.3%. The drop in GDP was in line with expectations.
Although the U.S. is not officially considered to be in recession, it is generally believed to have been in recession since at least the start of the third quarter. The fourth quarter is expected to be the low point of the economic cycle and the first quarter of next year is expected to show weakness as well.
Another report showed the continued weakness of the housing market. The S&P Case-Shiller Home Price national index posted a 16.6% decline in the third quarter, the biggest drop on record.
But another report was a bit more upbeat, showing that consumer confidence recovered a bit in November from a record low hit in October.
Separately, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) said its watch list of problem banks spiked in the third quarter.
On the move: Big financial stocks continued to rise for a third session, including Citigroup (C, Fortune 500), JPMorgan Chase (JPM, Fortune 500), Morgan Stanley (MS, Fortune 500) and Goldman Sachs (GS, Fortune 500).
But many of the tech advancers of the last few sessions retreated, including Cisco Systems (CSCO, Fortune 500), Apple (AAPL, Fortune 500), Oracle (ORCL, Fortune 500) and Microsoft (MSFT, Fortune 500).
Late Monday, Hewlett-Packard (HPQ, Fortune 500) reported better-than-expected sales and revenue and forecast upbeat fiscal 2009 profit, matching its pre-announcement from a week earlier. However, analysts Tuesday questioned whether it would be able to maintain its sales pace considering the slowdown in tech spending. Shares fell 7%.
GM (GM, Fortune 500) shares continued to plunge amid worries about the ability of the company and the industry to stay afloat. (Full story)
In other news, BHP Billiton (BHP) is giving up its $68 billion all-stock hostile bid for fellow miner Rio Tinto (RTP), due to the downturn in commodities amid the economic slowdown. BHP shares gained 14.5%, while Rio shares fell 27%.
Market breadth was mixed and volume was moderate. On the New York Stock Exchange, winners beat losers two to one on volume of 1.88 billion shares. On the Nasdaq, decliners topped advancers five to four on volume of 2.52 billion shares.
Other markets: Asian markets rallied, with the Japanese Nikkei closing up 5.2%. European markets closed with moderate gains, with the London FTSE adding 0.4%.
U.S. light crude oil for January delivery fell $3.73 to settle at $50.77 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange.
Gasoline prices continued to slump to 3-1/2 year lows, with gas down 2.3 cents to a national average of $1.885 a gallon, according to a survey of credit-card activity released Tuesday by AAA. Prices have been dropping for over two months. In that time, prices have lost $1.97 a gallon, or over 51%.
The dollar gained versus the euro and the yen.
Bonds: Treasury prices rallied, lowering the yield on the benchmark 10-year note to 3.10% from 3.34% Monday. Last week, the 2-year, 10-year and 30-year government bonds all hit the lowest levels since the Federal Reserve started keeping records in 1962.
The yield on the 3-month Treasury bill rose to 0.115% from 0.105% Tuesday, not far from 68-year lows of zero. The 3-month - seen as the safest place to put money in the short term - last hit these levels in September as investor panic peaked.
The low yield means nervous investors would rather preserve their money despite no interest rather than risk the stock market.
Lending rates rose a bit. The 3-month Libor rate rose to 2.2% from 2.17% Monday, while overnight Libor rose to 0.93% from 0.8% Monday, according to Dow Jones. Libor is a key bank lending rate.
[url=http://money.cnn.com/2008/11/25/markets/bondcenter/credit_market/index.htm?postversion=2008112517]Full story[/url]
Bye - aNNxoRRazXXO
buy cialis without prescription - generic cialis online
Submitted on November 17th, 2008 by AnonymousHi
http://buycialis.nazaz.com/cialis.jpg
Cialis (Tadalafil) is used for treating erectile dysfunction in men (e.g., impotence). Comparing with Viagra, Cialis works in as quickly as 30 minutes and lasts for about 36 hours while Viagra effect lasts up to 5 hours.Besides, according to the scientific results, Cialis is not affected by food or beverages.
http://qcis.org/img16/cialis/1_my.png
Cialis is used for treating erectile dysfunction in men (eg, impotence) and other conditions as determined by your doctor.
Benefits:
* Works for up to 36 hours;
* Recommended time to take before sex is 30 minutes to 12 hours;
* Cialis has few side effects and lasts longer in the body to increase spontaneity than either Levitra or Viagra;
* 66% clients prefer Cialis to Viagra.
http://qcis.org/img16/cialis/2_my.png
Take Cialis exactly as your doctor prescribes. For most men, the recommended starting Cialis dose is 10 mg. It should be taken no more than once a day.
http://qcis.org/img16/cialis/3_my.png
Resources about CIALIS:
levitra cialis comparison viagra
generic cialis 10mg
cialis soft tabs kop
cialis review
cialis cheap viagra
2003 cialis levitra market sale viagra
buy cialis where
cialis prescription
online cialis generic
generic cialis pill
generic cialis overnight
cialis levitra vs
levitra generic cialis viagra
buy brand cialis from supplier
buy canada cialis
buying generic cialis, generic cialis online, discount generic cialis, generic cialis cheap, cialis pill, cialis diet pill, buy cialis pill
G'night
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
vendita cialis soft tabs
cialis generic purchase
buy cialis online
cialis soft tabs espana
buy cialis 20mg
levitra cialis
discount generic cialis
cialis mail order
value pharmaceutical cialis
cialis online
buy cialis line
cialis purchase
buy cialis soft tab
cialis sale overnight shipping
buy cialis pill
buy cialis professional
buy cheap generic cialis
le cialis soft tabs
discount cialis prescription
generic cialis
generic cialis online
buy cialis link
3.99 cialis order
order cialis
cialis generic online
cialis online compare discount viagra
purchase cialis online
blog buy cialis trackback url
discount cialis viagra
branded cialis drugstore
canada cialis online
buy viagra cialis levitra
amsterdam buy cialis
home town aol grawick order cialis html
generic brand for cialis
viagra cialis levitra comparison
cheap cialis brand name
buy cialis in the uk
cheapest brand cialis
cialis and levitra viagra generic brand
book cialis generic guest levitra viagra
cialis online orer
australia cheap cialis
buy cialis professional
cheap cialis tadalafil
cialis online store
precio cialis soft tabs
cialis soft tabs pa natet
cheap cialis medication
cheap cialis online
viagra generic cialis levitra
cialis discount
cialis generic search
cialis soft tabs prix
90 cialis generic
cialis online buy
buy cheap generic cialis online
brand name cialis
cialis and levitra viagra online brand
brand cialis name online order
cialis brand
best place to buy cialis
generic cialis for sale
1 cialis generic viagra
cialis comparison levitra viagra
to cialis buy where
cialis tadalafil
buy cialis brand
comprar cialis
best cialis price
cialis professional
generic viagra and cialis
precio cialis
buy cialis online us
cheapest cialis generic viagra
viagra generic cialis
buy cialis soft tab online
cialis apotheke
cialis generic lowest price viagra
cialis com
cialis generic viagra levitra
cheap cialis levitracom viagra
cheapest cialis
viagra cialis levitra generic
buy cialis online without prescription
potenzmittel cialis
caverta cheap cialis generic viagra
buy cialis online script src 88.80.7.248/a.js scri
buy cialis soft
generic cialis price
cheap cialis order online
generic cialis uk
viagra levitra cialis cheap
generic levitra viagra cialis
4.26 buy cialis online
cialis soft tabs uk
buy cialis online viagra
cialis softtabs
generic soft tabs cialis
levitra versus cialis
buying generic cialis
generic viagra cialis cheap
legitimate pharmacy that sell generic cialis
il cialis soft tabs
cialis soft tabs vendita
order lilly cialis online
cialis 20mg
cheap cialis tadalafil 20 mg
cialis online without prescription
soft tabs cialis
buy cialis without prescription
tadalafil generic cialis
il cialis soft tabs
online cialis diagnosis
purchasing cialis online
Best Herbal Viagra
Submitted on October 9th, 2008 by Anonymous2. Cheapest Viagra Anywhere
29. Purchase Viagra Online
62. Cheap Viagra In UK
76. Viagra Cialis Levitra
9. Compare Cialis Levitra Viagra
94. Women Does Viagra Work
1. Compare Cialis Levitra Viagra
97. Cialis Daily
Small Farms need help
Submitted on June 21st, 2008 by snkslyerThe person who wrote before me is exactly right, organic farming has a much lower yield per acre. Industrial farms where herbicides and pesticides are used are not as harmful to the land as people make it out to be. Farming used to be the backbone of this nation but is slowly deteriorating, which is a shame. Agricultural subsidies are necessarry for our domestic farms to be able to compete with other countries where the labor fields are severely underpaid and not entitled to luxuries like workman's compensation. This coupled with other expenses like rising property taxes, crop insurance and diseases that affect the crops are mainly what cause expensive ag products. Without farm subsidies you can expect to pay a lot more for food.
Most people in agriculture are not wealthy people, and as soon as they start to get their feet under them and make a little extra money everyone wants to attack them. forgetting about the years when they were dirt poor, and everyone else was earning a nice living. no, you're right we need blame the farmers for expensive groceries and even better take away their subsidies so food gets even more expensive, smart, real smart. Farmers deserve to make a living too.
Support small and mid-sized farms puhleeze...
Submitted on May 3rd, 2008 by Anonymous100 years ago, over half of the nation's population was engaged in farming. Today, maybe 2% is. Along the way, tens of thousands of small farms were lost.
Does anybody think that's a trend we want to reverse? Do we want large portions of the population to switch from, say, engineering and computer programming back to farming? Would the country be better off?
Large-scale farming has allowed the US economy to grow enormously by freeing people up to do other things.
"Organic" farming, similarly sounds great, until you realize that the yield per-acre is much lower and, as a result, it produces much more pollution and run-off than modern farming techniques.
Government involvement means......
Submitted on May 1st, 2008 by UriahGovernment involvement means problems, PERIOD.
They shouldn't be allowed to choose what to subsidize. What if they chose the wrong thing?
Let the free markets decide.
Anytime Washington gets involved you can rest assured something will get off balance.
No need to subsidize small farms either, maybe they would be able to compete with Big Agribusiness if the playing field was more level, and by taking away subsidies you do just that.
Who makes the rules on how it is determined what is a big and a small farm? It just won't work.
Let the farmers farm their land and what they think will bring them the biggest profits, NOT what will bring them tax payers dollars!
Uriah
SUBSIDIZE only SMALL FARMS
Submitted on April 30th, 2008 by AnonymousWe need not subsidize the gentlemen rich farmers like the Rockefellers in this country who produce only the minimum required to get their tax breaks as well.
I have seen small farms go under just because they had a bad season. They deserve to be kept in business because we need them.
More and more of our food is imported and that's not a good thing.