A mountain of corn, destined to be ethanol
The Associated Press

A transport truck is buried under a mountain of corn headed for the ethanol production plant.

Featured Topic | Posted 36 weeks 6 hours ago

With food prices soaring, should the U.S. keep subsidizing farmers?

Washington's love affair with corn-based ethanol may be cooling, but President Bush and Congress are heatedly clashing over who is to blame for delays in responding to skyrocketing gas and food prices. Bush on Tuesday defended ethanol production, saying "it's in our national interest that our farmers grow energy, as opposed to us purchasing energy from parts of the world that are unstable or may not like us."

More and more legislators are blaming the rising use of corn as a biofuel as a key factor behind high food prices. Others want to freeze the federal mandate on biofuels production at current levels, reversing legislation passed just a few months ago that increases it through 2022. Still others are pushing to shift tax incentives away from corn-based to cellulose-based ethanol in the nearly completed farm bill. Bush favors shifting to cellulosic ethanol, too.

But should government subsidize the production of ethanol? Should government subsidize agriculture at all? Should fuel trump food, or does cheaper fuel also help keep food prices low?

Read More

Ben likes: Big Corn and the ethanol hoax

Walter Williams/Townhall.com

Ethanol production has driven up the prices of corn-fed livestock, such as beef, chicken and dairy products, and products made from corn, such as cereals. As a result of higher demand for corn, other grain prices, such as soybean and wheat, have risen dramatically. The fact that the U.S. is the world's largest grain producer and exporter means that the ethanol-induced higher grain prices will have a worldwide impact on food prices.

It's easy to understand how the public, looking for cheaper gasoline, can be taken in by the call for increased ethanol usage. But politicians, corn farmers and ethanol producers know they are running a cruel hoax on the American consumer. They are in it for the money. The top leader in the ethanol hoax is Archer Daniels Midland (ADM), the country's largest producer of ethanol. Ethanol producers and the farm lobby have pressured farm state congressmen into believing that it would be political suicide if they didn't support subsidized ethanol production. That's the stick. Campaign contributions play the role of the carrot.

Read More

Joel likes: Making America fat and polluted, one subsidy at a time

Christopher D. Cook/Christian Science Monitor

If the current measure passes Americans will shell out billions of dollars for farm subsidies that wreak havoc on our land and diets. These payments irresponsibly promote the consumption of cheap fatty foods, the depletion of soil and air through overuse of pesticides, and destructive farming practices.

Like farm bills past, this one also advances the removal of small farms, eroding the spirit and finances of rural communities across the U.S.

Instead of upholding these mega-farm subsidies, let's invest the public's money in sustainable growing practices, organic foods, and small and mid-sized farms that form the bedrock -- both economically and socially -- of communities throughout America's heartland.

Hardly a romantic nod to the past, such an overhaul is a practical investment in the future. As global warming heats up, we can't afford a system that guzzles 100 billion gallons of oil each year in pesticides and the long-distance transit of packaged foods. 

Read More

Where do you stand on this issue?

Click on the graph to cast your vote.
average
vote
your vote