Did John McCain really call for a 100-year war in Iraq?

In a long election campaign, candidates rarely miss a chance to seize on an opponent's off-the-cuff statements in hopes of taking advantage and winning support. Sometimes the criticism is dead-on accurate. Sometimes, a comment is ripped out of context and distorted unfairly.

On the stump and on the debate stage, Barack Obama has repeatedly hammered Republican John McCain for expressing a desire to keep the war in Iraq going for a century. In February, Obama said: “We are bogged down in a war that John McCain now suggests might go on for another 100 years.” And later: "(McCain) says that he is willing to send our troops into another 100 years of war in Iraq.”

Obama said on April 1, his position on Iraq was "very different from saying we're going to have a permanent occupation in Iraq. And it's certainly different from saying that we would have a high level of combat troops inside Iraq for a decade or two decades, or, as John McCain said, perhaps 100 years. I'm just quoting back what he said. Unless you tell me that that's a misquote."

Obama isn't the only Democrat to criticize McCain for his stance on the war. Democratic National Committee chairman Howard Dean has called McCain "a blatant opportunist who...is promising to keep our troops in Iraq for 100 years." And Hillary Clinton in February said: "We cannot take four more years of more of the same and if you listen to Sen. McCain, he wants to keep troops in Iraq, he has said, for up to 100 years.”

But McCain and his supporters insist that the Democrats are not quoting McCain fairly. Instead of talking about a 100-year-war or an active century-long occupation, McCain was talking about a security arrangement similar to what the United States has with Germany, Japan and South Korea.

Here is what McCain said at a townhall meeting in New Hampshire on January 3:

Q: President Bush has talked about our staying in Iraq for 50 years ...

McCAIN: Make it a hundred.

Q: Is that ...

McCAIN: We’ve been in South Korea … we’ve been in Japan for 60 years. We’ve been in South Korea 50 years or so. That would be fine with me. As long as Americans …

Q: (Something inaudible)

McCAIN: As long as Americans are not being injured or harmed or wounded or killed. That’s fine with me, I hope that would be fine with you, if we maintain a presence in a very volatile part of the world where Al Qaeda is training and equipping and recruiting and motivating people every single day.

In February, McCain elaborated:

And by the way, that reminds me of this hundred year thing. I was asked in a town hall meeting back in Florida, how long would we have a presence in Iraq? My friends, the war will be over soon, the war for all intents and purposes although the insurgency will go on for years and years and years, but it will be handled by the Iraqis, not by us, and then we decide what kind of security arrangement we want to have with the Iraqis. ...

And McCain addressed Obama's claim again on April 1:

It displays a fundamental misunderstanding of history and how we’ve maintained national security, and what we need to do in the future to maintain our security in the face of the transcendent challenge of radical Islamic extremism. And I understand that because he has no experience or background in any of it... (He) either hasn’t read or (doesn’t) understand…the history of this country in warfare, and the way that we secure alliances and secure the peace -- and that’s through military government to government agreements that call for United States presence and mutual defense. Not only in that country itself, but also in the region. Our troops in Japan maintain a military presence in Asia. Our troops in Japan and South Korea maintain stability in Asia. The same thing was true after World War II about our troops in Germany.

Factcheck.org called the Democrats' accusation against McCain "a rank falsehood."

Columbia Journalism Review also debunked the 100-year charge, noting "Obama is seriously misleading voters -- if not outright lying to them -- about exactly what McCain said. And some in the press are failing to call him on it."

So, McCain called for a 100-year-war/occupation of Iraq... truth or not?

Truth
42% (231 votes)
Not
58% (316 votes)
What do you think?

Join the Debate

Start your own blog, comment on topics, and let your voice be heard. Start your free account now!

User login

login

Ads by Google