What Part Of "Shall Not Be Infringed" Don't You Understand, Senator?
Posted 6 weeks 13 hours ago byIn her brief time in the national spotlight, Republican Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin, if nothing else, has rejuvenated the debate in this country regarding certain fundamental values. Interestingly, not all of this stems directly from the candidate's spoken statements but rather from a number of comments made about her by her Democratic counterpart Senator Joseph Biden.
From comments made on Fox and Friends mentioned in an Associated Press article titled “Biden says Palin family is off limits to critics”, voters learn that, to the Delaware Senator, government and politics are the ultimate and perhaps only source of values, truth, and hope.
In analyzing Palin’s acceptance speech, Biden remarked, “I didn’t hear the phrase ‘middle class’ mentioned. I didn’t hear a word about healthcare. I didn’t hear a word about what we’re going to do about the housing crisis, college education, and all the things that the middle class is being burdened by now.”
Maybe these things were not mentioned because for the most part they are not much of the government’s business. If anything, government involvement for the most part tends to exacerbate the problems in these perplexing areas.
For example, why is it the government’s responsibility (and thus ultimately the taxpayer’s) to bail you out of bad real estate investments? By subsidizing education to such an extent where it is available to just about everyone whether they really want it or not, its value has been undermined to the point where a bachelor’s degree may actually signify less actual learning than a high school diploma from previous generations.
Traditionally each social sphere oversaw the affairs in its own domain and exercised caution when venturing into the waters overseen by the neighboring spheres (especially if the one doing the intruding was the government). However, to liberals such as Biden, now as the government reaches into additional corners of our lives in the name of supposedly making our lives better, ultimately government and politics will be the only sphere that remains or be the sphere that ends up controlling all the others even it terms of the attitudes that these institutions will be permitted to express.
If the Obama campaign wants to refrain from commenting on the propriety of the daughter of a Vice Presidential candidate being expectant with child outside the bounds of marriage, that is the prerogative of the Obama campaign. After all, there are platoons of the far more deviant in the Democratic Party such as Chelsea Clinton who has been shacked up for years living in what used to be called “sin”.
However, though Obama might think he hands down stone tablets from on high with Biden taking them to the people as some kind of 21st century Moses, to say what the press and the people can and cannot discuss hints at a theoretical usurpation of the First Amendment even more offensive than an out of wedlock pregnancy or a recalcitrant segment of the public that does not sweep under the rug the moral values they have been taught simply because they have become an inconvenience to the elites that have set themselves up on a level above the rest of us.
The American people, through opinion-forming institutions such as the media, churches and now the blogosphere, must be the ones to decide for themselves this weighty ethical concern. For while the only right decision is to keep the baby, there are some so progressive in their outlook that they would ship to a Khmer Rouge-style reeducation camp anyone that does not reflexively embrace these new reproductive fads where the baby shower. To some of us, to takes a while to debate the consequences for any potential parental shortcomings when minors become parents before they properly ought.
There is indeed forgiveness and restoration in Christ. However, most of the time those stepping into these challenges are not up for consideration for one of the nation’s most solemn offices.
by Frederick Meekins













Thoughts
you are welcome
Submitted on October 8th, 2008 by Beoyou are welcome
I am
Submitted on October 8th, 2008 by Grains of Saltrather amazing. Thank you Beo.
GOS
Submitted on October 7th, 2008 by BeoThe connections you make never cease to amaze me.
Just a thought here..
Submitted on October 7th, 2008 by Grains of SaltIf I'm interviewing for VP and an issue raised is our military, am I allowed to talk about my son who is in the military? If sex education is an issue, is my family situation all of a sudden off limits? Why is that. You support a war and talk about your son, why can you be against sex education and then say your family situation is now off limits?
Is that fair? Was Joe Biden wrong?
Clintons?
Submitted on October 7th, 2008 by CORNFINGER66Yes it all goes back to the Clintons.
Chelsea living in sin? Where did 17 year olds get the idea of B-jobs?
Sorry to say but people have been living in sin since the beginng of time. Getting B-jobs before that.
Bravo!
Submitted on October 7th, 2008 by Grains of SaltYou wonder where they got the idea of BJs?
Beo, please. I was getting them long before Ken Star introduced the idea to you.
It is a shame that Biden
Submitted on October 7th, 2008 by BeoIt is a shame that Biden even feels that he has to say "hands off" to the press about a young girl. It is no one's business. There are many young kids out there doing all kinds of things. Some of them far worse than getting oneself pregnant out of wedlock. This type of attack by the media brings to mind the cliche, "There but for the grace of God, go I."
The mean spirited people who attack this young girl are the biggest of hypocrites. Many seventeen year olds, correction, most seventeen -year- olds out there have had sex. That is a fact. Many of them have become pregnant, but they have chosen to have an abortion. Many use B jobs instead of intercourse because that is not considered sex. Wonder where they got that idea. So for the reporters and pundits to bring this young woman into their talking points is totally unfair and naive. I know they don't live in glass houses, so watch out...what goes around comes around.
By the way, I think Joe Biden is a stand up guy and I give him credit for being compassionate. It is unfortunate that so many of Obama's supporters don't see it his way.
Try reading the
Submitted on October 7th, 2008 by AnonymousTry reading the Constitution. You'll soon see that Government has far exceeded it powers. All three branches need to reigned in.
Right-wing religious wacko
Submitted on October 7th, 2008 by rom12921"Biden remarked, “I didn’t hear the phrase ‘middle class’ mentioned. I didn’t hear a word about healthcare. I didn’t hear a word about what we’re going to do about the housing crisis, college education, and all the things that the middle class is being burdened by now.”"
"Maybe these things were not mentioned because for the most part they are not much of the government’s business."
Well stated. Most Obama / Biden supporters are gleefully cheering on Socialism.
The 10th Ammendment needs to be used or pass a 28th repealing to reflect the current circumstances where the Feds have no limitations on power.
Right-wing religious wacko, you can't tell me how to live! - just getting the emotion-based moral relativism out of the way.
Olive green looks good on them.
Submitted on October 6th, 2008 by Grains of SaltAccording to everything that Govt. should NOT be doing in your mind, the candidates need to try on Castros fatigues if all they're needed for is starting wars. Well, that and telling gays how not to live.
Sorry but I have no idea what the rest was about. Are you saying that we should be talking about the young Palin?